简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Regal Securities, Inc. has agreed to pay a $50,000 fine. But why?
Background
Financial Industry Authority (FINRA) has fined Regal Securities, Inc $50,000. According to FINRA, from August 2017 through January 2019, Regal did not establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written procedures, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with FINRA rules regarding surveilling for potentially manipulative trading.
According to the report, in July 2017, a Regal branch manager assist a customer who did not meet the qualification to open a new account on August 10, 2017.
The firm delegated responsibility for the supervision of this customer‘s trading to the branch manager and another registered representative responsible for the account, both of whom were registered with FINRA as General Securities Principals. Both registered representatives provided the firm with assurances that they would monitor the customer’s account activity.
However, This customer began trading in the new account on August 22, 2017. Initially, some of the customers trading generated firm surveillance alerts indicating potential marking the close activity on August 23, 24, 28, and 29, 2017. Then, on August 31, a Regal executive informed the account representative that the account may need to be closed due to this trading activity.
While surveillance alerts were being generated, Regal Securities failed to review them or take any action regarding the customer at that time.
During that period, the customers trading activity were suspected to be illegal and triggered numerous alerts. Between November 2017 and June 2018, the customers trading activity generated approximately 40 surveillance alerts indicating potential wash trading.
FINRA Response
FINRA claimed that Regal‘s WSPs did not describe how alerts were to be reviewed, or how those reviews were to be documented. Moreover, the firm did not evidence that reviews were in fact conducted to determine whether the activity was manipulative, except for in a small number of instances. In addition, neither representative on the account escalated any concerns about the customer’s trading to the compliance department, and the compliance department did not otherwise follow up with the representatives after forwarding the alerts for review.
Regal also failed to establish a supervisory system reasonably designed to detect another potentially manipulative trading. The firm had no surveillance to detect layering or similar activity until January 2019.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Analyzing last year's trading data offers invaluable insights into market trends, helps refine trading strategies, and enhances decision-making for future trades.
For new traders entering the world of forex, choosing the right broker is one of the most crucial decisions they’ll make. A reliable broker can serve as a trusted partner, providing a platform that’s secure, transparent, and regulated. However, with thousands of options available, selecting the right broker can be overwhelming. That is why WikiFX is here to make things easy for you!
Saxo Singapore will discontinue SaxoWealthCare and SaxoSelect by December 2024, advising clients to withdraw funds and offering alternative investment options.
TradingView adds Irish stocks from Euronext Dublin, broadening access to 30 companies, including Ryanair and Kerry Group.