简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:FXPRIMUS has been found guilty of closing out clients' trades without consent, denying withdrawals, and maintaining unresponsive customer support.
In the world of online trading, the promise of profit often goes hand in hand with the looming threat of unforeseen obstacles. For one unfortunate trader, whose identity remains undisclosed, the ordeal they faced with the broker FXPRIMUS serves as a grim reminder of the challenges in this industry. This trader's experience not only highlights the unresolved withdrawal issues but also underscores the crucial role that platforms like WikiFX play in providing assistance and solutions.
The trader in question invested a substantial $3,000, with their trading journey progressing as expected. However, the situation took a disconcerting turn when FXPRIMUS abruptly closed all of the trader's profitable open positions and disabled the withdrawal button on their website. This unexpected move left the trader in a state of confusion and frustration.
With a current account balance of $10,972, it's only reasonable that the trader wishes to withdraw their funds. After all, it's their hard-earned money. However, their efforts to access their funds proved futile, and they found themselves unable to withdraw even a single cent.
The act of closing out clients' trades without their consent is a significant red flag within the realm of online trading. This action not only breaches the fundamental trust that traders place in their chosen brokers but also raises serious concerns about the broker's intentions. In essence, it can be seen as a way for unreliable brokers to potentially take advantage of their clients' hard-earned funds. By closing profitable positions without consent, traders may miss out on potential gains, and in some cases, incur unexpected losses, as their carefully constructed trading strategies are disrupted.
Additionally, the speed and ease of withdrawals are pivotal indicators of a broker's credibility. A broker should facilitate client withdrawals promptly and without unnecessary obstacles. If the withdrawal process is overly complicated or takes an excessive amount of time, it is a glaring warning sign. Such delays can lead traders to question the broker's intentions, and rightly so. In some unfortunate instances, unreliable brokers may use prolonged withdrawal processes as a tactic to deter clients from accessing their funds. For traders, timely and efficient withdrawals are essential, and any hindrance in this process should raise alarm bells.
WikiFX, a well-known international platform for researching forex regulations, contains verified details about more than 50,000 brokers. According to WikiFX's database, FXPRIMUS holds a low WikiScore, highlighting its lack of credibility as a broker. If the trader had consulted WikiFX before engaging with FXPRIMUS, it might have prevented the distressing situation they now find themselves in.
The trader's harrowing experience with FXPRIMUS serves as a stark reminder of the hurdles that traders may face in the world of online trading. It is essential for traders to be equipped with the right resources and support, especially when confronted with unresolved withdrawal issues. So download your free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or App Store now!
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
In the current political climate, understanding the policy differences between the main candidates has become increasingly important. As the 2024 U.S. presidential election approaches, the intense rivalry between Trump and Harris not only influences voters' decisions but also determines the future direction of the nation at a crucial time. With voting imminent, voters face two distinctly different governance philosophies and policy directions that impact not only U.S. domestic and foreign policy but also profoundly affect the global investment landscape.
As the 2024 U.S. presidential race approaches, investors worldwide are closely watching potential outcomes and their implications for global markets. While a 269-269 Electoral College tie between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump remains unlikely, its occurrence would set the stage for an unprecedented period of political uncertainty, triggering a contingent election decided by Congress. Such uncertainty would ripple across forex, stock, and oil markets, where stability and predictability are prized. Here’s a look at how a tie could affect these key financial sectors.
A former finance officer in Malaysia lost RM450,000 in savings after being deceived by an investment scheme advertised on social media.
A 50-year-old Malaysian woman experienced a devastating loss exceeding RM80,000 after falling victim to an online investment scam that preyed on her aspirations for substantial returns. The victim, a former secretary at a private firm, had initially hoped to secure a profitable investment opportunity but instead found herself deceived by a fraudulent scheme.