简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has taken disciplinary action against CSC Futures (HK) Limited (CSC), imposing a fine of $4.95 million for significant lapses in adhering to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has taken disciplinary action against CSC Futures (HK) Limited (CSC), imposing a fine of $4.95 million for significant lapses in adhering to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations. These breaches occurred between January 2017 and December 2018, during which CSC was found to have failed in key compliance areas concerning its clients trading activities.
The SFC‘s investigation revealed that CSC did not conduct the necessary due diligence on Customer Supplied Systems (CSSs) used by 100 of its clients for placing orders during the material period. This lack of scrutiny meant that CSC was unable to properly evaluate and mitigate the risks associated with money laundering (ML), terrorist financing (TF), and other financial crimes. The use of CSSs, which allow clients to interface with the company’s trading systems, posed potential risks that went unmonitored, leaving the firm vulnerable to misconduct.
Another critical finding by the SFC concerned irregularities in deposit patterns in five client accounts. The investigation showed that the deposits made into these accounts were inconsistent with the clients declared financial profiles, raising concerns over possible ML/TF risks. Despite these red flags, CSC failed to detect, investigate, or properly address the discrepancies due to inadequate monitoring systems. This failure to implement an effective oversight mechanism meant that suspicious activities could occur without the necessary checks.
The SFC concluded that CSC‘s internal systems and controls during the relevant period were not only inadequate but also ineffective in preventing risks related to AML/CFT. Specifically, the company did not ensure full compliance with Hong Kong’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, the AML Guidelines, and the SFCs Code of Conduct, all of which set critical standards for financial firms to follow.
In determining the severity of the penalties, the SFC considered several factors. It highlighted that CSC‘s lapses were serious as they could potentially undermine public confidence in the market and damage its integrity. Given the firm’s failure to implement robust AML/CFT measures, the SFC determined that disciplinary action was necessary to reinforce the importance of compliance and risk management within the financial sector.
However, the regulator also acknowledged that CSC cooperated with the investigation and has an otherwise clean disciplinary record. This cooperation likely influenced the SFC's decision on the penalty, but the firms failures in monitoring client activities and implementing sufficient controls were deemed serious enough to warrant the substantial fine.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A 54-year-old foreign woman lost her life savings of RM175,000 to an online investment scam that promised high returns within a short timeframe. The scam was orchestrated through a Facebook page named "Spark Liang."
Forex broker scams continue to evolve, employing new tactics to appear credible and mislead unsuspecting traders. Identifying these fraudulent schemes requires vigilance and strategies beyond the usual advice. Here are five effective methods to help traders assess the legitimacy of a forex broker and avoid potential pitfalls.
Doo Financial, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Doo Group, has expanded its regulatory footprint by securing new offshore licenses from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) and the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).
A new programme has been launched by CFI to address the growing need for transparency and awareness in online trading. Named “Trading Transparency+: Empowering Awareness and Clarity in Trading,” the initiative seeks to combat misinformation and equip individuals with resources to evaluate whether trading aligns with their financial goals and circumstances.