简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:LISTEN TO ARTICLE 3:41 SHARE THIS ARTICLE ShareTweetPostEmail Photographer: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomb
LISTEN TO ARTICLE
3:41
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
Tweet
Post
Photographer: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg
Photographer: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg
Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks Covid-19s impact on trade. Sign up here, and subscribe to our Covid-19 podcast for the latest news and analysis on the pandemic.
The U.S. stepped up pressure on Germany and France with extra tariffs on some of their goods, a move designed to squeeze the European Union into settling a long-running dispute over illegal subsides to Airbus SE.
In a statement in Washington on Wednesday, the U.S. Trade Representative‘s office said it’s removing from the tariff list certain products from Greece and the U.K., and adding an equivalent amount of trade from France and Germany. The change is effective Sept. 1 and will apply to French and German jams as well as butchers and mincing knives, which will be subject to a 25% duty.
“The EU and member states have not taken the actions necessary to come into compliance with WTO decisions,” Ambassador Robert Lighthizer said in the statement. “The United States, however, is committed to obtaining a long-term resolution to this dispute.”
The amount of products subject to countermeasures remains at $7.5 billion and the tariff rates stay at 15% for aircraft and 25% for all other products, the USTR said.
Airbus said it “profoundly regrets” the U.S.‘s decision to maintain the tariffs despite Europe’s recent actions to achieve full compliance at a time when aviation and other sectors are going through an unprecedented crisis.
“Airbus trusts that Europe will respond appropriately to defend its interests and the interests of all the European companies and sectors, including Airbus, targeted by these tariffs,” it said in a statement.
{21}
Why the Boeing vs. Airbus Fight Is Coming to a Head: QuickTake
{21}{22}
The announcement prolongs the burden of import taxes on American businesses and consumers while increasing the pain on transatlantic allies just as the global economy tries to claw back from a steep downturn tied to the Covid-19 pandemic. U.S. retailers, restaurants and importers that are struggling to stay afloat after nearly six months of restrictions and lockdowns had pleaded with USTR for tariff relief.
{22}
“There is clear evidence that the U.S. beverage alcohol industry has been negatively impacted as a direct result of these tariffs, which is now being compounded by the impact of restrictions related to preventing the spread of Covid-19,” a group of U.S. trade associations wrote in a letter to USTR, one of nearly 24,000 public comments submitted in the case.
The Trump administration won a long-awaited judgment from the World Trade Organization last October stemming from a dispute between Airbus and Boeing Co. that dragged on for more than 15 years. The ruling authorized tariffs on a record $7.5 billion in European imports.
The EU, meanwhile, is waiting for a WTO decision to come as early as September that may allow for retaliation against the U.S. Brussels has asked for its own multibillion-dollar award in a separate case that found Chicago-based Boeing Co. received illegal subsidies.
{27}
Negotiations
{27}{28}
EU trade chief Phil Hogan last month stepped up a call for the U.S. to negotiate a settlement to the transatlantic dispute. Failing to resolve the issue will force the 27-nation bloc to impose tit-for-tat tariffs on American goods and ultimately leave both sides weaker.
{28}
{30}
“We should sit down and talk in the next couple of months,” Hogan said during an online event organized by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “Otherwise, were going to be putting tariffs on each other for the rest of this year.”
{30}
USTR Lighthizer last month told Chatham House that a settlement with the EU must “require commitments to not do it again but also paying back some element of the subsidy.”
Just how much payback and in precisely what form remains unclear. So far, Washington has rejected at least three offers from Brussels for a settlement because the EU and U.S. “dont have the same number,” he said.
The U.K. has been caught in the crossfire. British companies are subject to U.S. tariffs because they were part of the EU during the Airbus subsidy years, but Prime Minister Boris Johnsons government is largely frozen out of any effort by Brussels to negotiate a settlement now that Britain has left the bloc.
(Updates with affected products in second paragraph.)
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.