简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Andeerson Wong discussed his experience with two brokers that he has traded before: Zeromarkets and FXTM. If you want to learn what is look like when trading with these brokers. please continue to read.
By Andeerson Wong
For ZEROMARKETS
Positive
I still using ZEROMARKETS as my choice of broker as of now.
ZEROMARKETS is an ASIC Australia license broker and the spread is so low, or as low as a liquidity provider. MT4 server is very stable and fast and can run using a high-speed trading Expert advisor.
No issue of withdrawal and they follow strictly ASIC rules on deposit and withdrawal, so the documentation must be in order for all transactions. ZEROMARKETS also has a good internal copy trade system and only be seen after sign-up.
Finally, The headquarters is in Australia and the other markets localize support is good and having local people to contact and Whatsapp you should you have any questions.
Negative
Strictly following ASIC is good but sometimes it‘s also too strict and sometimes customers may not like it. They also do not have a lot of advertising and promotions so many traders don’t see them often and they always think this is a new broker. In fact, already many years in Australia and expanded outside of Australia a few years ago.
Anyway, the Branding is not huge yet and that is why not many traders use ZEROMARKETS.
For FXTM
I had been using FXTM for some years and below are my experiences with them.
Positive
FXTM is good with a very fast server and can run using high-speed EA as well. Micro account is one of the best options for new traders and for those who like to start trading with minimum capital. If traders like to copy others' trading, they also can invest in the Fund Manager service where FXTM has a good Copytrade system.
Negative
FXTM is closing a lot of offices worldwide and more concentrate on centralized Customer support and a lot of clients lost contact with localized staff, so the local support is no more available now.
Sometimes, withdrawal has delayed and the feedback is not on time.
Finally, the localize office and localize support are no more there and it brings a lot of inconveniences to localize traders and a lot of new traders cannot have the questions answered on time.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A recent allegation against STP Trading has cast doubt on the firm's business practices, highlighting the potential risks faced by retail traders in an increasingly crowded and competitive market.
Cross-border payments are now faster, cheaper, and simpler! Explore fintech, blockchain, and smart solutions to overcome costs, delays, and global payment hurdles.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public warning regarding a fraudulent entity impersonating Admiral Markets, a legitimate and authorised trading firm. The clone firm, operating under the name Admiral EU Brokers and the domain Admiraleubrokerz.com, has been falsely presenting itself as an FCA-authorised business.
A 57-year-old Malaysian man recently fell victim to a fraudulent foreign currency investment scheme, losing RM113,000 in the process. The case was reported to the Commercial Crime Investigation Division in Batu Pahat, which is now investigating the incident.