简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has taken action against Peter L. Bryant of Texas and his company, Bryant Capital Trade Management Corporation (Bryant Capital). The CFTC has issued an order that both files and settles charges related to fraudulent activities and regulatory non-compliance. These actions pertain to Bryant's role as an unregistered commodity trading advisor (CTA) and the failure to register as required.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has taken action against Peter L. Bryant of Texas and his company, Bryant Capital Trade Management Corporation (Bryant Capital). The CFTC has issued an order that both files and settles charges related to fraudulent activities and regulatory non-compliance. These actions pertain to Bryant's role as an unregistered commodity trading advisor (CTA) and the failure to register as required.
As per the order, Bryant and Bryant Capital are obligated to make a joint payment of $55,655.90 for restitution purposes, alongside a civil monetary penalty amounting to $195,000. Additionally, they are compelled to cease any further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations. The order also enforces a four-year trading and registration ban on both Bryant and Bryant Capital.
Case Background
The order's details reveal that from approximately February 2014 to December 2022, Bryant and Bryant Capital operated as unregistered CTAs. They utilized various methods, including direct outreach, electronic communications, newsletters, and web-based advertisements, to provide advice on trading commodity options, futures, and swaps within energy markets. These solicitations were designed to promote the respondents' paid trading advisory services.
However, the CFTC order highlights that these solicitations contained multiple false and misleading statements about their business operations, expertise, experience in energy derivatives markets, client base, and past performance. For instance, in one newsletter, they inaccurately claimed to have served 47 clients in 2021, offering detailed analyses and recommendations that resulted in substantial cost reductions. Yet, these claims were discovered to be entirely fabricated.
Furthermore, the respondents misleadingly represented that their business was operating as an “exempt swap intermediary,” exempting them from CFTC registration requirements. The order reveals that these misrepresentations led to client losses amounting to at least $55,655.90.
The CFTC emphasizes that orders requiring restitution might not guarantee the recovery of lost funds due to a potential lack of funds or assets. The organization remains steadfast in its commitment to safeguarding customers and holding wrongdoers accountable.
The case was overseen by a dedicated team within the Division of Enforcement, including Nina Ruvinsky, Bryan Hsueh, Allison Passman, Scott Williamson, and Robert Howell.
Public Awareness and Reporting
The CFTC strongly advises the public to verify a company's registration status with the CFTC before investing funds. If a company is unregistered, individuals are advised to exercise caution when considering financial transactions with that company. Information about a company's registration can be accessed through NFA BASIC.
Customers and other individuals who come across suspicious activities or potential violations of commodity trading laws are encouraged to report such instances to the Division of Enforcement. This can be done through a toll-free hotline at 866-FON-CFTC (866-366-2382), by filing a tip or complaint online, or by contacting the CFTC Whistleblower Office. Whistleblowers may be eligible to receive between 10% and 30% of the monetary sanctions as part of the CFTC Customer Protection Fund, which is funded by sanctions collected from violators of the CEA.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public warning regarding a fraudulent entity impersonating Admiral Markets, a legitimate and authorised trading firm. The clone firm, operating under the name Admiral EU Brokers and the domain Admiraleubrokerz.com, has been falsely presenting itself as an FCA-authorised business.
A 57-year-old Malaysian man recently fell victim to a fraudulent foreign currency investment scheme, losing RM113,000 in the process. The case was reported to the Commercial Crime Investigation Division in Batu Pahat, which is now investigating the incident.
Protect your investments! Learn about unregulated firms flagged by the FCA and discover how WikiFX helps traders avoid scams and choose legitimate brokers.
Proprietary trading firm The Funded Trader has detailed its financial recovery efforts following a turbulent period marked by an unsustainable payout model. Addressing these challenges publicly, the firm outlined the steps being taken to resolve outstanding obligations and ensure operational sustainability.