简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Image copyrightEPA Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt says "extra time" may be needed to finalise legisla
Image copyrightEPA
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt says “extra time” may be needed to finalise legislation for Brexit.
Mr Hunt said a possible delay in the UK's departure from the EU beyond the 29 March deadline depended on the progress made in the coming weeks.
MPs have voted for Theresa May to seek “alternative arrangements” to the Irish backstop, after rejecting her Brexit deal earlier this month.
But the EU has rejected the UK's calls to renegotiate the withdrawal deal.
The UK is due to leave the European Union at 23:00 on 29 March. The backstop is an “insurance” policy to stop the return of checks on goods and people along the Northern Ireland border.
Earlier this month, Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom said that the EU may be prepared to grant the UK a “couple of extra weeks” beyond the 29 March deadline to finalise preparations for Brexit.
And BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said there had been “growing chatter” about a potential delay and a potential extension to Article 50 - the mechanism by which the UK leaves the EU.
But Downing Street has said an extension to Article 50 is not being considered and the government remains “committed to doing whatever it takes to have the statute books ready for when we leave the EU on 29 March this year”.
EU rejects calls to reopen Brexit deal
May and Corbyn meet after Commons clash
Brexit: What could happen next?
Mr Hunt told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: It is true that if we ended up approving the deal in the days before the 29 March, then we might need some extra time to pass critical legislation.
But if we are able to make progress sooner, then that might not be necessary.
We can't know at this stage exactly which of those scenarios would happen."
Mrs May has been talking to EU leaders, including President of the European Council Donald Tusk and the Irish Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, after MPs voted on Tuesday for her to make changes to the backstop.
Mr Hunt said it was currently a “challenging situation” and the government was “not ruling out any of these potential solutions” to the Irish border issue.
Mr Hunt said the commitment to the Good Friday Agreement - which protects against the return of a hard Irish border - would need to be demonstrated.
The EU's concerns that the UK could “access the single market by the back door” would also need to be alleviated, he said.
“If we can overcome those two issues, which I think we can, then we will be able to have substantive discussions,” he said.
But this is not going to happen in the next few days."
May scores 'unconventional win'
Firms 'speeding up no-deal Brexit plans'
Brexit: A really simple guide
The backstop was one of the main reasons Mrs May's Brexit deal was voted down in Parliament by a historic margin earlier in January as critics say a different status for Northern Ireland could threaten the existence of the UK and fear that the backstop could become permanent.
The prime minister has said there are several possible alternatives to the backstop that she wants to discuss with EU leaders.
These include:
a “trusted trader” scheme to avoid physical checks on goods flowing through the border
“mutual recognition” of rules with the EU
“technological” solutio
She also wants to discuss a time limit on the backstop and a “unilateral exit” mechanism - both options ruled out by the EU in the past.
But the EU's chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, has said the Irish backstop is “part and parcel” of the UK's Brexit deal and will not be renegotiated.
Speaking at the European Parliament on Wednesday, Mr Barnier said it was a “realistic solution” to preventing a hard border.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.