简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Financial-market concerns have become something like a new third mandate for the Federal Reserve, alongside its statutory objectives of price stability and full employment, according to Prudential Financial Inc.
Financial-market concerns have become something like a new third mandate for the Federal Reserve, alongside its statutory objectives of price stability and full employment, according to Prudential Financial Inc.
Numerous investors have warned about a potential market reckoning from the Fed‘s involvement. Scott Minerd, chief investment officer at Guggenheim Investments, has been particularly vocal in his objections, envisioning among other things an extreme bubble in corporate bonds. BlackRock Inc.’s Peter Gailliot said the Fed is “crossing some lines” and cautioned about potential moral hazard. Some are concerned that the stock markets recovery might reduce appetite for further fiscal stimulus measures out of Washington.
Fed Is All In: Here Are the Key Features of Its Lending Programs
But Krosby argued that things could have been very different if the Fed had stayed out of the way.
“You trade in the market you have, not the one you want,” Krosby said. “Yes, it created zombie companies but it also opened the credit markets, and thats key for the future.”
The Fed by a 1977 law was assigned the goals of “maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates,” but has also been charged by Congress with promoting financial stability.
“You‘ll hear, ’oh, this is artificial. Why is this artificial? It is what it is,” Krosby said of the current state of financial markets. “Price is price.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.