简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Westpac, a major Australian bank and financial services provider, has been ordered by a federal court to pay a penalty of AU$113 million (around $82.9 million) for compliance failures across multiple business units.
The bank charged services fees to over 11,800 deceased customers.
The judge said that the bank “systemically” failed to address the lapses.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London.
Announced on Friday, the court decision came on six separate civil proceedings against the bank filed by the Australian financial market supervisor, ASIC, last November.
Systemic Lapses
The major compliance breaches by the bank include charging advice fees to over 11,800 deceased customers for financial advice services and distributing duplicate insurance policies to over 7,000 customers. For the first, it was penalized with AU$40 million, whereas it need to pay $15 million for the other offense.
The bank also charged ongoing contribution fees for financial advice to retail customers without any proper disclosure. In the past eight years, it charged at least AU$10.6 million to more than 25,000 customer accounts without providing any disclosure. For this, the bank has been penalized to pay AU$6 million.
Further, Westpac allowed around 21,000 deregistered company accounts with AU$120 million in fund holdings to remain open. These funds should have been remitted to the ASIC or the Commonwealth, but the bank allowed withdrawals. The court found that the bank was aware of its system flaws but did not fix them and continued to benefit from them. Now, it needs to pay AU$20 million for this lapse.
The court also slapped further AU$12 million and AU$20 million penalties separately for debt on sale and insurance superannuation lapses, respectively.
“The breaches found by the Court in these six cases demonstrate a profound failure by Westpac over many years and across many areas of its business to implement appropriate systems and processes to ensure its customers were treated fairly,” said ASICs Deputy Chair, Sarah Court.
“Consumer harm caused by systems failures is unacceptable. Financial institutions must invest in systems that allow them to meet their obligations to customers.”
Meanwhile, Westpac is not a stranger to such hefty fines for non-compliance measures. In 2020, the bank agreed to pay AU1.3 billion as a fine for several non-compliance allegations brought by the ASIC.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
According to the report, Doo Group, a prominent Singapore-based online brokerage firm, has strengthened its global presence by securing new offshore licenses for its brokerage brand, Doo Financial. The company recently announced that entities under the Doo Financial umbrella have been granted licenses by two key offshore regulatory bodies: the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) and the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).
In recent months, PrimeX Capital, a Forex and CFD broker established in 2022, has become a subject of concern in the trading community. However, despite these enticing features, the broker's reputation has been severely tarnished by multiple complaints and a troubling lack of regulatory oversight.
Forex broker scams continue to evolve, employing new tactics to appear credible and mislead unsuspecting traders. Identifying these fraudulent schemes requires vigilance and strategies beyond the usual advice. Here are five effective methods to help traders assess the legitimacy of a forex broker and avoid potential pitfalls.
Doo Financial, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Doo Group, has expanded its regulatory footprint by securing new offshore licenses from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) and the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).