简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:JP Morgan hit with $18M fine for SEC whistleblower rule violation. Learn about the case and its implications. Stay informed with our updates.
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has found itself in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has agreed to pay a substantial $18 million penalty to resolve allegations of wrongdoing. The SEC has accused JPMS of obstructing its clients from reporting potential violations of securities laws to the regulatory body, a clear violation of whistleblower protection rules.
Here's the crux of the matter: From March 2020 to July 2023, JPMS repeatedly requested its retail clients to sign confidential release agreements, but only if they had received credits or settlements from the company exceeding $1,000. These confidential agreements mandated that clients keep any information related to the settlement and underlying facts confidential. More importantly, these agreements prohibited clients from voluntarily reaching out to the SEC, even though they were allowed to respond to SEC inquiries.
The SEC has come down hard on JPMS for this practice. According to Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, “Whether it's in your employment contracts, settlement agreements, or elsewhere, you simply cannot include provisions that prevent individuals from contacting the SEC with evidence of wrongdoing.” Essentially, JPMS put its clients in a difficult situation by making them choose between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC. This either-or scenario not only compromised critical investor protections but was also found to be illegal.
Corey Schuster, Co-Chief of the Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit, emphasized that “Investors, whether retail or otherwise, must be free to report complaints to the SEC without any interference.” Anyone drafting or using confidentiality agreements needs to ensure they do not include provisions that obstruct potential whistleblowers.
JPMS has been found in violation of Rule 21F-17(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a whistleblower protection rule explicitly prohibiting actions that hinder individuals from communicating directly with the SEC staff regarding possible securities law violations. While JPMS did not admit wrongdoing, it agreed to a series of measures. These include accepting censure, committing to cease from violating the whistleblower protection rule in the future, and paying the $18 million civil penalty.
The SEC's investigation into JPMS's practices was conducted by Marie DeBonis and Jessica Neiterman, with the assistance of John Farinacci, and it was overseen by Virginia Rosado Desilets, Brianna Ripa, Mr. Schuster, and Andrew Dean, all members of the SEC's Asset Management Unit. Rua Kelly of the Trial Unit also provided support during the investigation.
In conclusion, JPMS's $18 million penalty underscores the importance of adhering to whistleblower protection rules and ensuring that individuals, regardless of their position, can freely report concerns to the SEC. This case serves as a stark reminder that the integrity of our financial system relies on transparency and accountability, and actions that obstruct these principles will not be tolerated.
Explore J.P. Morgan's profile on WikiFX for in-depth information: Visit their WikiFX page here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/8981623292.html
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
In recent months, PrimeX Capital, a Forex and CFD broker established in 2022, has become a subject of concern in the trading community. However, despite these enticing features, the broker's reputation has been severely tarnished by multiple complaints and a troubling lack of regulatory oversight.
Forex broker scams continue to evolve, employing new tactics to appear credible and mislead unsuspecting traders. Identifying these fraudulent schemes requires vigilance and strategies beyond the usual advice. Here are five effective methods to help traders assess the legitimacy of a forex broker and avoid potential pitfalls.
Doo Financial, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Doo Group, has expanded its regulatory footprint by securing new offshore licenses from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) and the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).
A new programme has been launched by CFI to address the growing need for transparency and awareness in online trading. Named “Trading Transparency+: Empowering Awareness and Clarity in Trading,” the initiative seeks to combat misinformation and equip individuals with resources to evaluate whether trading aligns with their financial goals and circumstances.