简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms’ failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.
Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.
SARs are critical tools for law enforcement, designed to provide insights into transactions that may indicate illegal activities. Under federal law, broker-dealers are required to file SARs that detail any unusual or suspicious transactions. The SEC emphasised that incomplete or inaccurate reporting undermines the effectiveness of these reports, depriving regulatory agencies and law enforcement of the intelligence needed to address financial crimes.
The SECs investigation revealed that Webull, Lightspeed, and Paulson had submitted SARs with missing or insufficient details between 2018 and 2022, failing to meet the required standards. As part of the settlement, Webull and Paulson also committed to hiring compliance consultants to enhance their anti-money-laundering programmes, demonstrating an effort to address these shortcomings.
Jason Burt, Director of the SECs Denver Regional Office, stated that the omissions in the SARs hindered the ability of law enforcement to gather timely and valuable intelligence. He reiterated the pivotal role of SARs in safeguarding market integrity and ensuring compliance with federal regulations.
The investigation, spearheaded by the SEC‘s Denver Regional Office in collaboration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), highlights the regulator’s focus on ensuring broker-dealers uphold their obligations to report potential financial misconduct accurately.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Find the best Forex brokers for 2025 with low spreads, zero commissions, and no hidden fees. Simplify your trading journey with insights and the WikiFX app!
FXOpen announced the trading competition called ForexCup Trading Championship 2025 for traders. You can join, trade, and compete for exciting prizes. Here are the details
The 2011 film Margin Call offers a gripping portrayal of the early hours of the 2008 financial crisis, set within a Wall Street investment firm. While the film is a fictionalised account, its lessons resonate strongly with traders and finance professionals. For one trader, watching the film had a lasting impact, shaping how they approached risk, decision-making, and the harsh realities of the financial world.
Over the past decade, one particular avenue has gained significant popularity: proprietary trading, or prop trading. As more traders seek to maximize their earning potential while managing risk, many are turning to proprietary firms for the resources, capital, and opportunities they offer. In this article, we’ll explore why an increasing number of traders are choosing proprietary trading firms as their preferred platform for success.