简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:With the economy in real danger, the White House is showing an odd ambivalence about added relief measures.
With all that‘s gone wrong with the Covid-19 pandemic, it’s easy to miss something that went reasonably well: the three bills Congress passed in March to rev up the response to the crisis and provide economic relief. Theres plenty to criticize in the details of the legislation. But if the most important thing was to move quickly, in the correct direction and with sufficient substance? Then Congress and President Donald Trump deserve considerable credit for getting it done. Add to that a supplemental bill to boost the Paycheck Protection Program and other funding in April, and everyone was off to a good start.
Unfortunately, that momentum has totally stalled. The House passed its version of a “Phase 4” bill a while ago, which would‘ve supplied more than $3 trillion in additional funding. But Senate Republicans have adopted a “wait and see” strategy on further relief, saying they want to judge the effects of previous rounds before spending more. They’re still waiting, despite looming deadlines on expanded unemployment insurance and the PPP, as well as other seemingly urgent needs.
Trump, again to his credit, has talked about the need for further stimulus. But as with many aspects of public policy, he also takes the opposite position fairly often. So the biggest problem for the White House is that Trump hasnt backed up his activist position with any sense of urgency. Another problem is that the administration no longer has many experts the president could lean on for advice if he was willing to do so.
The result has been a series of proposals that seem borrowed from conservative movement boilerplate — really, a capital-gains tax holiday? — rather than designed for the specific circumstances the economy faces. The White House also appears to be leaning toward the smaller relief package that Senate Republicans favor. If that‘s what they’re really going to fight for, there are two ways to read it. One is that Trump has been rolled (again) by orthodox Republicans. The other is that Trump is himself ambivalent about further stimulus measures, just as hes been ambivalent about acting aggressively to stem the pandemic. He seems to think that taking dramatic action to solve a problem is bad politics compared to pretending the problem doesnt exist.
(That may be one of the reasons Trump has been so reluctant to wear a mask. It also seems to account for for his antipathy toward Dr. Anthony Fauci, the infectious-disease expert who is currently being targeted by a bizarre White House smear campaign.)
Of course, outside of Trump‘s strongest supporters, this isn’t going to work — with evictions coming, small businesses throwing in the towel and what started as a surprisingly strong recovery now in danger of failing altogether, Trump should be desperate for ways to prop up the economy and stop the pandemic rather than counting on his ability to bluff his way through.
Perhaps he‘ll come around as negotiations continue. Although the delay has been damaging, a serious stimulus package now would still help. But if talks break down, with the virus on the rise in most states, there’s a chance for some really scary outcomes for the economy over the next few months. Is Trump really going to take that risk in an election year? All the incentives say he won‘t — but if Trump followed normal incentives, the White House wouldn’t be attacking Anthony Fauci right now.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.